From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30593 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2005 17:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30547 invoked by uid 48); 8 Apr 2005 17:25:27 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050408172527.30539.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040930205445.17758.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040930205445.17758.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/17758] gfortran_abort should be marked as noreturn X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg01027.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08 17:25 ------- I am going to fix this. Is there any other known functions that don't return in fortran? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17758