From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9626 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2005 03:09:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9485 invoked by uid 48); 9 Apr 2005 03:09:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 03:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050409030924.9484.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040227003937.14311.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040227003937.14311.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/14311] builtins for atomic operations needed X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg01104.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09 03:09 ------- I'm working on atomic builtins, but this will *not* resolve the problem of compiling for i386 and i486+. Indeed, it could easily make it worse because you won't have the kind of control you did before wrt hiding these operations in out-of-line functions. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-03-26 05:33:24 |2005-04-09 03:09:22 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14311