From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14984 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2005 20:45:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14975 invoked by uid 48); 9 Apr 2005 20:45:07 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 20:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050409204507.14974.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041222050828.19126.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041222050828.19126.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19126] Missed IV optimization (redundant instruction in loop) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg01177.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09 20:45 ------- This shows up a lot in fortran code like the following (and yes I copied this from some where and reduced it): SUBROUTINE d ( a, b, ndim ) IMPLICIT NONE INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: ndim REAL,DIMENSION(ndim,ndim) :: a REAL,DIMENSION(ndim,ndim) :: b b(1,:) = a(2,:) END SUBROUTINE d -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2004-12-28 23:54:33 |2005-04-09 20:45:06 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19126