From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-138233-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25747 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2005 18:30:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25671 invoked by uid 48); 13 Apr 2005 18:30:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:30:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050413183001.25666.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050317082132.20514.aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20050317082132.20514.aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20514] hoisting of label out of jumptable would take place at cse, should happen at trees
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg01776.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-13 18:30 -------
Two things, we just don't jump thread.
Another testcase:
int i;
int main()
{
  for (;;)
  {
    switch (i)
    {
      case 5:
        i = 4;
        break;
      default:
        return 0;
    }
  }
}

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20514