From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2879 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2005 06:25:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2800 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2005 06:24:55 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050417062455.2799.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "aoliva at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050220111234.20103.falk@debian.org> References: <20050220111234.20103.falk@debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/20103] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in create_tmp_var with C99 style struct initializer X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg02271.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:24 ------- Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable types On Apr 17, 2005, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Mark, did you give up on COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPRs in C++ for 4.0? The >> C++ portion of the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR20103 is still >> awaiting review even for mainline :-( > Our messages crossed. Ironically, I was just making a pass over the > open 4.0 regressions, and realized that I'd failed to review this > patch. It's an ICE-on-invalid on a GNU C++ extension, so I've now > pushed it back to 4.0.1. I will be sure to review it before then. > Sorry, No worries. I didn't think it was all that important, but thought I'd point it out just in case you'd forgotten about it. How about reviewing it for mainline ASAP, so that we can be even more confident when it goes into 4.0.1? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103