From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23107 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2005 18:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22982 invoked by uid 48); 17 Apr 2005 18:01:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050417180153.22981.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hjl at lucon dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050417163305.21070.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20050417163305.21070.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/21070] [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg02314.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-17 18:01 ------- .L_ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv13 is a local alias of _ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv. When _ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv is discarded, I am trying to figure out what happened to .L_ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv13. My simple testcase indicates linker will issue an error. But gcc shouldn't use .L_ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv13 when _ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv is a link once symbol. It should use _ZN4java4util7logging6Logger7getNameEv directly. I think this bug affects all link once targets. It is just that it shows up on ia64 immediately. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070