From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16900 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2005 22:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16856 invoked by uid 48); 17 Apr 2005 22:25:15 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050417222515.16855.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050323163529.20605.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050323163529.20605.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20605] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c scan-tree-dump-times iter 0 fails X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg02335.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 22:25 ------- Binary search on ia64-hpux shows the failure appeared between 2005-03-22 22:04 UTC and 2005-03-22 22:30 UTC. The only plausibly responsible patch in that range is 2005-03-22 Zdenek Dvorak * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (determine_iv_cost): Do not try to preserve artificial original candidates. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20605