From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10744 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2005 23:07:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10715 invoked by uid 48); 17 Apr 2005 23:07:51 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050417230751.10713.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050323163529.20605.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050323163529.20605.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20605] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c scan-tree-dump-times iter 0 fails X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg02352.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 23:07 ------- Hmm, maybe we are just selecting the orignal IV as the IV which we should use, this is just a missed optimization. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |missed-optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20605