From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18157 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2005 17:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18081 invoked by uid 48); 18 Apr 2005 17:56:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050418175634.18080.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050409015142.20912.dnovillo@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050409015142.20912.dnovillo@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/20912] C++ FE emitting assignments to read-only global symbols X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg02443.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 17:56 ------- Simple code which shows we now have a missed optimization: static const double a = 1.0; static const double b = a+1.0; double c() { return b; } See PR 21089. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |21089 Bug 20912 depends on bug 21089, which changed state. Bug 21089 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21089 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEWBug 20912 depends on bug 21089, which changed state. Bug 21089 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21089 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20912