public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
@ 2004-05-28 20:47 cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 21:02 ` [Bug c/15698] " cgd at broadcom dot com
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cgd at broadcom dot com @ 2004-05-28 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
trunk srcs as of 2004-05-27 00:00 UTC.
attachment compiled like "gcc x.c" produces error like:
x.c: In function `rindex':
x.c:16: error: argument 'a' doesn't match prototype
x.c:2: error: prototype declaration
whereas the actual prototype declaration is is built-in. I tried to
trim the test further, and that made it work as expected, producing:
x.c: In function `rindex':
x.c:16: error: argument 'a' doesn't match prototype
cc1: error: prototype declaration
--
Summary: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cgd at broadcom dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
@ 2004-05-28 21:02 ` cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 22:18 ` [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cgd at broadcom dot com @ 2004-05-28 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cgd at broadcom dot com 2004-05-28 05:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=6410)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6410&action=view)
test case to trigger problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 21:02 ` [Bug c/15698] " cgd at broadcom dot com
@ 2004-05-28 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-29 1:47 ` cgd at broadcom dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-28 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-28 11:22 -------
Confirmed, for some reason I can only confirm this with rindex, I tried to do the same for sqrt and exp
but they would not cause the error.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-28 11:22:55
date| |
Summary|wrong error in presence of |[3.5 Regression] wrong error
|builtin fn + K&R |in presence of builtin fn +
|declaration. |K&R declaration.
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 21:02 ` [Bug c/15698] " cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 22:18 ` [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-29 1:47 ` cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-06-01 2:00 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cgd at broadcom dot com @ 2004-05-29 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cgd at broadcom dot com 2004-05-28 17:34 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] wrong error in presence of
builtin fn + K&R declaration.
At 28 May 2004 11:22:58 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Confirmed, for some reason I can only confirm this with rindex, I tried to do the same for sqrt and exp
> but they would not cause the error.
yeah, it seemed very fragile. Maybe something about argument types
or number of arguments, who knows.
chris
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-29 1:47 ` cgd at broadcom dot com
@ 2004-06-01 2:00 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-01 2:22 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-01 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-01 02:00 -------
The problem is the variable current_function_prototype_locus in c-decl.c. It is
set conditionally, but then used unconditionally for error messages. The result
is that if it wasn't set before it was used, then you get an old incorrect
value. You can potentially get an uninitialized value if it was never set, but
since it is a global that just gives a value of zero. In this case, when foobar
is redeclared, it is set to line 2, then when rindex is redeclared, it is not
set because rindex is a builtin, and then later we print line 2 as if that was
where rindex was first declared. It should be cleared if we don't set it, or
alternately, it shouldn't be used if it wasn't set.
I can reproduce the same problem with exp. You have to change the return type
to match, i.e. change both decls to use double instead of char *.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-01 2:00 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-01 2:22 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-15 21:25 ` [Bug c/15698] [4.0 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: zack at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-01 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-01 02:22 -------
current_function_prototype_locus should really be a property of the relevant
DECL. The problem with that is, there's nowhere to put it. We could enlarge
the C lang_decl structure, but I hate chewing up more space on something that's
only ever used for error messages. Ideas?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-01 2:22 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-15 21:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-15 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-15 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 21:25 -------
Now we don't get any diagnostic for the testcase at all. From the
regression hunter I think my patch for bug 13801 is probably to blame for
that. In formal terms a diagnostic isn't required here, but I'm inclined
to think the check of old-style definition against prototype should be
applied using the type in the external scope rather than just the visible
type - although information from an invisible prototype shouldn't be merged
into the subsequent function type. (Incompatibility of any prototype,
anywhere in the program, with the definition, is compile-time undefined;
standard built-in functions are reserved with external linkage and defining
them is beyond the scope of the standard so errors make sense there too.)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-15 21:25 ` [Bug c/15698] [4.0 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-15 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-15 21:55 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-15 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 21:49 -------
: Search converges between 2004-08-26-trunk (#525) and 2004-08-27-trunk (#526).
Looking at the above date which is from using Phil's regression hunter, we can say almost definitely
JSM's patch to fix bug 13801 is the patch which fixed this one too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration.
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-15 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-15 21:55 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2005-04-21 5:01 ` [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk @ 2004-10-15 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-15 21:55 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] wrong error in presence of builtin
fn + K&R declaration.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Looking at the above date which is from using Phil's regression hunter,
> we can say almost definitely JSM's patch to fix bug 13801 is the patch
> which fixed this one too.
I wouldn't say fixed; rather, hid. There was a bug about the diagnostic
referencing the wrong location. The diagnostic was correct; the location
was wrong. Now there is a bug that the diagnostic is missing. A fix
should aim to fix both.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-15 21:55 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
@ 2005-04-21 5:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 0:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-21 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-21 5:01 ` [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-30 0:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 1:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-30 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 15698 depends on bug 16666, which changed state.
Bug 16666 Summary: [3.4 regression] dremf type conflict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16666
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-30 0:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-02 1:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-02 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 01:55 -------
Working on a fix.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2004-05-28 11:22:55 |2005-05-02 01:55:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-02 1:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-02 19:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-02 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 19:39 -------
Subject: Bug 15698
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 2005-05-02 19:39:04
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-decl.c c-tree.h
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: builtins-30.c
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: pr15698-1.c pr15698-2.c pr15698-3.c
pr15698-4.c pr15698-5.c pr15698-6.c
pr15698-7.c pr15698-8.c
Log message:
PR c/15698
* c-tree.h (C_DECL_BUILTIN_PROTOTYPE): New.
* c-decl.c (current_function_prototype_built_in,
current_function_prototype_arg_types): New.
(merge_decls): Keep source location of prototype followed by
nonprototype declaration. Update C_DECL_BUILTIN_PROTOTYPE.
(builtin_function): Set C_DECL_BUILTIN_PROTOTYPE.
(start_function): Always set current_function_prototype_locus,
current_function_prototype_built_in and
current_function_prototype_arg_types. Check for external
prototype whether or not visible for external function and set
current_function_prototype_arg_types accordingly.
(store_parm_decls_oldstyle): Use
current_function_prototype_arg_types for checking old-style
definition against prototype. Give warnings only if
current_function_prototype_built_in).
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/builtins-30.c: Update expected messages.
* gcc.dg/pr15698-1.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-2.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-3.c,
gcc.dg/pr15698-4.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-5.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-6.c,
gcc.dg/pr15698-7.c, pr15698-8.c: New tests.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.8565&r2=2.8566
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.650&r2=1.651
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.201&r2=1.202
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5428&r2=1.5429
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-3.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-4.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-5.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-6.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-7.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-8.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtins-30.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-02 19:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-02 19:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-02 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 19:45 -------
Subject: Bug 15698
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 2005-05-02 19:45:27
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-decl.c c-tree.h
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: builtins-30.c
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: pr15698-1.c pr15698-2.c pr15698-3.c
pr15698-4.c pr15698-5.c pr15698-6.c
pr15698-7.c pr15698-8.c
Log message:
PR c/15698
* c-tree.h (C_DECL_BUILTIN_PROTOTYPE): New.
* c-decl.c (current_function_prototype_built_in,
current_function_prototype_arg_types): New.
(merge_decls): Keep source location of prototype followed by
nonprototype declaration. Update C_DECL_BUILTIN_PROTOTYPE.
(builtin_function): Set C_DECL_BUILTIN_PROTOTYPE.
(start_function): Always set current_function_prototype_locus,
current_function_prototype_built_in and
current_function_prototype_arg_types. Check for external
prototype whether or not visible for external function and set
current_function_prototype_arg_types accordingly.
(store_parm_decls_oldstyle): Use
current_function_prototype_arg_types for checking old-style
definition against prototype. Give warnings only if
current_function_prototype_built_in).
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/builtins-30.c: Update expected messages.
* gcc.dg/pr15698-1.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-2.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-3.c,
gcc.dg/pr15698-4.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-5.c, gcc.dg/pr15698-6.c,
gcc.dg/pr15698-7.c, pr15698-8.c: New tests.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.7592.2.211&r2=2.7592.2.212
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.630.6.8&r2=1.630.6.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.193.4.3&r2=1.193.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5084.2.153&r2=1.5084.2.154
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-3.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-4.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-5.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-6.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-7.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr15698-8.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtins-30.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.4&r2=1.4.48.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken builtin fn + K&R declaration
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-02 19:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-02 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-02 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 19:51 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-02 19:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-28 20:47 [Bug c/15698] New: wrong error in presence of builtin fn + K&R declaration cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 21:02 ` [Bug c/15698] " cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-05-28 22:18 ` [Bug c/15698] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-29 1:47 ` cgd at broadcom dot com
2004-06-01 2:00 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-01 2:22 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-15 21:25 ` [Bug c/15698] [4.0 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-15 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-15 21:55 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2005-04-21 5:01 ` [Bug c/15698] [4.0/4.1 Regression] no error in presence of broken " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-30 0:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 1:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).