From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7587 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2005 13:53:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7540 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2005 13:53:17 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050423135317.7535.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050408155154.20845.jv244@cam.ac.uk> References: <20050408155154.20845.jv244@cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20845] error needed X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg03240.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 13:53 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 4.4 : 'Unlike explicit initialization, default initialization does not imply > that the object has the SAVE attribute' So? I still don't see why this is invalid. The error message FX quoted still doesn't make any more sense to me. What am I missing? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20845