From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-139833-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7063 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2005 11:48:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6956 invoked by uid 48); 24 Apr 2005 11:48:42 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050424114842.6955.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040819145911.17100.steinmtz@us.ibm.com>
References: <20040819145911.17100.steinmtz@us.ibm.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/17100] Missed opportunity for value range optimization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg03376.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-24 11:48 -------
i_8: VARYING


  # i_8 = PHI <0(0), i_10(4)>;
<L2>:;
  if (i_8 == -5) goto <L3>; else goto <L8>;


  i_10 = i_8 + 1;
  if (i_10 <= 9) goto <L2>; else goto <L6>;

i_10: [1, 2147483647]

Hmm, isn't i_10 signed still so why between 1 and -1, that does not make sense.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17100