From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-139850-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17466 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2005 14:02:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17254 invoked by uid 48); 24 Apr 2005 14:02:24 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050424140224.17253.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "kazu at cs dot umass dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050414204122.21030.janis@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20050414204122.21030.janis@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21030] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range building 176.gcc with -O2
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg03393.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu  2005-04-24 14:02 -------
I just went through the regression testing.  I get

FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr18178.C scan-tree-dump-times if  1

It may be a good idea to check in this patch with the above testcase
XFAILed.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21030