public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
@ 2004-10-26  4:18 dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-26  4:25 ` [Bug target/18154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-26  4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

int min(int a, int b) {
  if (a < b)
    return a;
  else
    return b;
}

should produce

        rlwinm  r2,r3,1,31,31
        subfc   r0,r4,r3
        rlwinm  r0,r4,1,31,31
        subfe   r0,r2,r0
        andc    r2,r4,r0
        and     r0,r3,r0
        or      r3,r0,r2
        blr

but instead produces a branch sequence

         mr r0,r3
         mr r3,r4
         cmpw cr7,r0,r4
         bgelr- cr7
         mr r3,r0
         blr

with unnecessary dependencies.

-- 
           Summary: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: *-*-*
  GCC host triplet: powerpc-*-*
GCC target triplet: *-*-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
  2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-26  4:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-26 20:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-26  4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-26 04:25 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-10-26 04:25:17
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
  2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-26  4:25 ` [Bug target/18154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-26 20:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-26 21:25 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-26 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-26 20:06 -------
XLC chooses the straight-line code sequence versus compare and branch based on 
a cost model.  This should not be a uniform change in behavior for PowerPC.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
  2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-26  4:25 ` [Bug target/18154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-26 20:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-26 21:25 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-27 23:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-26 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-26 21:25 -------
Also, do not enable when optimizing for size.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
  2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-26 21:25 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-27 23:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-27 23:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-24 14:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-27 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-27 23:45 -------
I'm not sure that subfc/subfe is going to be cheaper than a compare and a branch, even if the branch is 
mispredicted half the time.  Do you have timing results?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
  2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-27 23:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-27 23:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-24 14:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-27 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-27 23:52 -------
I should note when I was doing SPEC work, using subfc/subfe did not help SPEC at all (I tried to change 
the source and also rs6000.md).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC
  2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-27 23:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-24 14:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-24 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-24 14:31 -------
On the mainline, we now produce:
        cmpw cr7,r3,r4
        blelr- cr7
        mr r3,r4
        blr



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-24 14:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-26  4:18 [Bug target/18154] New: Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-26  4:25 ` [Bug target/18154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-26 20:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-26 21:25 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-27 23:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-27 23:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-24 14:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).