public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "matz at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/21089] [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:46:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050428024608.774.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20050418172616.21089.matz@suse.de> ------- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-04-28 02:46 ------- Uhm, wait. Perhaps the optimization would be invalid for your changed example from comment #5, but see below. But it will not be invalid for my initial testcase, where it missed to propagate 20.0 into setPosition. Why I think the transformation is valid _also_ for comment #5: See 3.6.2 #2: ------------------------------- An implementation is permitted to perform the initialization of an object of namespace scope with static storage duration as a static initialization even if such initialization is not required to be done statically, provided that * the dynamic version of the initialization does not change the value of any other object of namespace scope with static storage duration prior to its initialization, and * the static version of the initialization produces the same value in the initialized object as would be produced by the dynamic initialization if all objects not required to be initialized statically were initialized dynamically. ------------------------------------- It then goes on to provide an example which uses an inline function to dynamically initialize something, where comment #5 uses an arithmetic expression. So I think we are permitted to do this optimization, in both, by initial example, and Andrews example from comment #5. Reopening. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21089
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-28 2:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-04-18 17:26 [Bug c++/21089] New: c++ accepts invalid static const double members with initializer matz at suse dot de 2005-04-18 17:32 ` [Bug c++/21089] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 17:40 ` matz at suse dot de 2005-04-18 17:47 ` [Bug c++/21089] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double members pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 17:50 ` [Bug c++/21089] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 17:53 ` [Bug c++/21089] [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ front-end does not "inline" the static const double pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 17:59 ` matz at suse dot de 2005-04-18 18:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 18:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 18:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18 18:41 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-04-18 19:36 ` schlie at comcast dot net 2005-04-21 5:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 2:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 2:46 ` matz at suse dot de [this message] 2005-04-28 8:03 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 9:24 ` matz at suse dot de 2005-05-02 14:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 1:42 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20 14:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 16:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-21089-183@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-10-11 7:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 16:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 16:58 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-10-11 17:00 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-11 17:03 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-10-11 17:05 ` mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-11 17:10 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-10-11 17:15 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-10-11 20:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 20:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 21:05 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 17:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 17:41 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050428024608.774.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).