From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19022 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2005 17:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18839 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2005 17:33:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050428173347.18838.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hpreg at vmware dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050303182300.20304.hpreg@vmware.com> References: <20050303182300.20304.hpreg@vmware.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/20304] Invalid value returned by operator '&' when -O is used X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg03983.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hpreg at vmware dot com 2005-04-28 17:33 ------- This was filed as bug 169225 in the libsigc++ bugzilla database (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169225). While it is still unclear whether what libsigc++ did is a libsigc++ bug or a g++ bug, the libsigc++ folks went ahead and produced a patch to fix the issue in their code, in order not to rely on something that is potentially unspecified by the C++ standard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20304