From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2181 invoked by alias); 1 May 2005 18:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2164 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2005 18:08:57 -0000 Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 18:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050501180857.2163.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "deemkay at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050501083031.21314.deemkay@gmail.com> References: <20050501083031.21314.deemkay@gmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/21314] C++ performance regression with -Os X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From deemkay at gmail dot com 2005-05-01 18:08 ------- hmm. code size is actually bigger with -Os. -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 15689 May 1 12:02 pr21314-O0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 8333 May 1 12:02 pr21314-O1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 8405 May 1 11:35 pr21314-O2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 8157 May 1 12:03 pr21314-O3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 dirtyepic users 12989 May 1 11:35 pr21314-Os ( $ g++ -Ox -Wall -march=pentium3 cpptest.cpp -o pr21314-Ox ) the only modification should be the branding.. but if you can't reproduce i must have overlooked something. i'll do a manual build and see if it goes away. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21314