From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-141143-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14522 invoked by alias); 2 May 2005 19:09:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14498 invoked by alias); 2 May 2005 19:09:21 -0000
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 19:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050502190921.14497.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050420095616.21120.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20050420095616.21120.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2005-05-02 19:09 -------
Subject: Re:  Empty declaration with typeof accepted

"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| Confirmed. Funny enough, icc accepts the code as well... 

would there be compilers union consipracy? ;-)

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120