From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8144 invoked by alias); 3 May 2005 16:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7281 invoked by alias); 3 May 2005 16:22:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 16:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050503162205.7280.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050213054900.19933.casevh@comcast.net> References: <20050213054900.19933.casevh@comcast.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/19933] Problem with define of HUGE_VAL in math_c99. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-03 16:21 ------- Subject: Re: Problem with define of HUGE_VAL in math_c99. On Tue, 3 May 2005, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > 1. Can we work around bug 20558 by using the sizeof trick for isinf? No, because all of __builtin_isinf, __builtin_isinff, __builtin_isinfl may fall back to library functions isinf, isinff, isinfl and Solaris libc/libm doesn't have those functions. > 2. Can we use __builtin_finite for isfinite? No, because again all the __builtin_finite* functions may fall back to library functions and the only one of those Solaris has is plain "finite". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19933