public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 19:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050503194014.7574.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050123205037.19595.Thomas.Koenig@online.de>


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-03 19:40 -------
Subject: Bug 19595

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Branch: 	gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by:	tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org	2005-05-03 19:39:36

Modified files:
	libgfortran    : ChangeLog 
	libgfortran/io : transfer.c 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: eor_handling_1.f90 eor_handling_2.f90 
	                           eor_handling_3.f90 eor_handling_4.f90 
	                           eor_handling_5.f90 noadv_size.f90 
	                           pad_no.f90 

Log message:
	2005-05-03  Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
	
	Backport from mainline:
	PR libfortran/17992
	PR libfortran/19568
	PR libfortran/19595
	PR libfortran/20005
	PR libfortran/20092
	PR libfortran/20131
	PR libfortran/20661
	PR libfortran/20744
	* io/transfer.c (top level): eor_condition: New static variable.
	(read_sf): Remove unnecessary zeroing of buffer (there is enough
	information in its length).
	Return a string of length 0 (to be padded by caller) if EOR was
	seen previously.
	Remove erroneous special casing of EOR for standard input.
	Set eor_condition for non-advancing I/O if an end of line was
	detected.
	Increment ioparm.size if necessary.
	(formatted_transfer):  Skip the function if there is an EOR condition.
	(data_transfer_init):  Initialize eor_condition to zero (false).
	(next_record_r):  Clear sf_seen_eor if a \n has been seen already.
	(finalize_transfer):  If there is an EOR condition, raise the error.
	
	2005-05-03  Thomas Koenig  <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
	
	Backport from mainline:
	* eor_handling_1.f90: New test case.
	* eor_handling_2.f90: New test case.
	* eor_handling_3.f90: New test case.
	* eor_handling_4.f90: New test case.
	* eor_handling_5.f90: New test case.
	* noadv_size.f90: New test case.
	* pad_no.f90: New test case.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.163.2.22&r2=1.163.2.23
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.32.2.2&r2=1.32.2.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5084.2.156&r2=1.5084.2.157
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eor_handling_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eor_handling_2.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eor_handling_3.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eor_handling_4.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eor_handling_5.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/noadv_size.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pad_no.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.6.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19595


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-03 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-23 20:50 [Bug libfortran/19595] New: eor and advance="yes" should not mix Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-24  8:13 ` [Bug libfortran/19595] " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-24 20:38 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-25 12:45 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-26 21:43 ` [Bug libfortran/19595] eor does not work Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-26 21:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 15:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 15:46 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 15:47 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 15:47 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-30 14:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13  0:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-10  8:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-10  8:39 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-05-03 19:45 ` [Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-03 19:51 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-05  7:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050503194014.7574.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).