public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop
@ 2005-05-07 21:27 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-07 21:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21449] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-07 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The loop unroller over estimates the unrolled sized of an empty loop:
int f(void)
{
int i;
for(i = 0 ;i < 10; i++);
}

We get:
  Loop size: 5
  Estimated size after unrolling: 10

-- 
           Summary: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of
                    a loop
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21449


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21449] Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop
  2005-05-07 21:27 [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-07 21:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-26 20:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-07 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|4.0.0                       |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21449


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21449] Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop
  2005-05-07 21:27 [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-07 21:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21449] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-26 20:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-26 20:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-26 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-26 20:20 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|TREE                        |
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-06-26 20:20:46
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21449


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21449] Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop
  2005-05-07 21:27 [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-07 21:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21449] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-26 20:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-26 20:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-30 11:13 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-12  0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-26 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-26 20:48 -------
tree complete unrolling, for the record...  beef for zdenek? 
 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21449


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21449] Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop
  2005-05-07 21:27 [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-06-26 20:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-30 11:13 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-12  0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-30 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-30 11:13 -------
I don't think it is useful to fix this.  The proper way of handling this kind 
of loops is to just remove them, not to unroll them completely.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21449


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/21449] Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop
  2005-05-07 21:27 [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-06-30 11:13 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-12  0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-12  0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-12 00:02 -------
Fixed by removing of the loop instead.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21449


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-12  0:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-07 21:27 [Bug tree-optimization/21449] New: Loop unroller is way over estimating the unroll size of a loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-07 21:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21449] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-26 20:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-26 20:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-30 11:13 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12  0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).