public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
@ 2004-11-21 11:44 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2004-11-21 11:44 ` [Bug target/18592] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (19 more replies)
  0 siblings, 20 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2004-11-21 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/270340]

works with 3.2.3, fails with 3.3.5 and 3.4.3.

  Matthias

gcc -I/build/buildd/erlang-9.2.2/erts/emulator/beam -g -O2
-I/build/buildd/erlang-9.2.2/erts/m68k-unknown-linux-gnu           
+-DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-I/build/buildd/erlang-9.2.2/erts/emulator/sys/unix          
+-I/build/buildd/erlang-9.2.2/erts/emulator/beam -DOTP_SYSTEM_VERSION=\"R9C\" -o
                                             
+/build/buildd/erlang-9.2.2/erts/obj/m68k-unknown-linux-gnu/erlexec.o -c
./erlexec.c                                          
erlexec.c: In function `build_args_from_env':                                  
                                              
erlexec.c:1249: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as
operand                                        
Please submit a full bug report,                                               
                                              
with preprocessed source if appropriate.                                       
                                              
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.                       
                                              
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see                  
                                              
<URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-3.3/README.Bugs>.        

Preprocessed source for erlexec is available at http://people.debian.org/~cts/gcc/

It does not happen with -O1 and -O0 on both, gcc(-3.3) and gcc-3.4.

-- 
           Summary: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand:
                    invalid expression as operand
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.5
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: m68k-linux
  GCC host triplet: m68k-linux
GCC target triplet: m68k-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2004-11-21 11:44 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2004-11-21 11:46 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2004-11-21 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  2004-11-21 11:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=7575)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7575&action=view)
preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2004-11-21 11:44 ` [Bug target/18592] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2004-11-21 11:46 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2004-11-21 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2004-11-21 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zippel at linux-m68k dot
                   |                            |org, schwab at suse dot de
      Known to fail|                            |3.3.5 3.4.3
      Known to work|                            |3.2.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2004-11-21 11:44 ` [Bug target/18592] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
  2004-11-21 11:46 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2004-11-21 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-21 22:59 ` schwab at suse dot de
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-21 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
      Known to work|3.2.3                       |3.2.3 4.0.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-21 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-21 22:59 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2004-11-23 17:11 ` schwab at suse dot de
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-11-21 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2004-11-21 22:59 -------
This is the change that triggers the bug: 
 
Sun Jul 21 00:54:54 CEST 2002  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz> 
 
	* gcse.c: Include cselib.h 
	(constptop_register): Break out from ... 
	(cprop_insn): ... here; kill basic_block argument. 
	(do_local_cprop, local_cprop_pass): New functions. 
	(one_cprop_pass): Call local_cprop_pass. 
 
 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jh at suse dot cz


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-21 22:59 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-11-23 17:11 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2004-12-07  0:39 ` belyshev at lubercy dot com
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-11-23 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jh at suse dot cz
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-11-23 17:11:09
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-23 17:11 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-12-07  0:39 ` belyshev at lubercy dot com
  2004-12-13  9:14 ` bernie at develer dot com
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: belyshev at lubercy dot com @ 2004-12-07  0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com  2004-12-07 00:39 -------
// small testcase, use '-O2'

void foo (int j, int k)
{
    for(;;) {
        switch (j) {
        case 2: j = 1;  break;
        case 1: switch (k) {} break;
        case 4: switch (k) {} break;
        case 3: switch (k) {} break;
        case 5: j = 1; break;
        }
    }
}


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|3.3.5 3.4.3                 |3.3.5 3.4.3 3.4.4
   Last reconfirmed|2004-11-23 17:11:09         |2004-12-07 00:39:26
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-07  0:39 ` belyshev at lubercy dot com
@ 2004-12-13  9:14 ` bernie at develer dot com
  2004-12-13  9:30 ` bernie at develer dot com
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bernie at develer dot com @ 2004-12-13  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2004-12-13 09:14 -------
And you also need -m68020 to trigger the bug.  Works
fine with -m68000, so the bug must hide in one of the
TARGET_68020 patterns.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-13  9:14 ` bernie at develer dot com
@ 2004-12-13  9:30 ` bernie at develer dot com
  2004-12-13  9:44 ` bernie at develer dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bernie at develer dot com @ 2004-12-13  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2004-12-13 09:29 -------
It happens both on ColdFire and 680x0 (x>=2), but not
on 68000.

output_addr_const() gets passed a TRUNCATE (HImode) rtx.

I could find it in the last dump before the ICE:

(insn 87 45 127 3 (set (reg:HI 0 %d0 [35])
        (const:HI (truncate:HI (minus:SI (label_ref:SI 11)
                    (label_ref:SI 54))))) 28 {*m68k.md:784} (nil)
    (insn_list:REG_LABEL 11 (insn_list:REG_LABEL 54 (nil))))

The pattern definition in m68k.md is:

(define_insn ""
  [(set (match_operand:HI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=g")
        (match_operand:HI 1 "general_src_operand" "gS"))]
  "!TARGET_COLDFIRE"
  "* return output_move_himode (operands);")


It seems output_move_himode() inappropriately lets the
TRUNCATE pass through, but since the instruction being
generater is a move.l, the only place in output_move_himode()
where this could have happened is:

  else if (CONSTANT_P (operands[1]))
    return "move%.l %1,%0";


I don't know how to fix it, this is all I could do.
The full GDB backtrace is:

#0  output_addr_const (file=0x82b7b50, x=0xb7fa94f0) at
/usr/local/src/uclinux-tools/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/final.c:3276
#1  0x080fa36e in output_addr_const (file=0x82b7b50, x=0xb7fa94f8)
    at /usr/local/src/uclinux-tools/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/final.c:3202
#2  0x081d575e in print_operand ()
#3  0x080fa26b in output_operand (x=0xb7fa94f8, code=0) at
/usr/local/src/uclinux-tools/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/final.c:3145
#4  0x080fa03c in output_asm_insn (template=0x8246011 "move%.l %1,%0",
operands=0x828ec20)
    at /usr/local/src/uclinux-tools/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/final.c:3071
#5  0x080f9105 in final_scan_insn (insn=0xb7ff6820, file=0x82b7b50, optimize=2,
prescan=0, nopeepholes=0,
    seen=0xbffff4fc) at /usr/local/src/uclinux-tools/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/final.c:2449
#6  0x080f7de7 in final (first=0xb7ff32c0, file=0x82b7b50, optimize=2, prescan=0)
    at /usr/local/src/uclinux-tools/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/final.c:1572
#7  0x081b8461 in rest_of_compilation ()
#8  0x081d81a2 in tree_rest_of_compilation ()
#9  0x08059ba2 in c_expand_body_1 ()
#10 0x081d937b in cgraph_expand_function ()
#11 0x081da690 in cgraph_optimize ()
#12 0x0807dd51 in c_objc_common_finish_file ()
#13 0x081b9c44 in toplev_main ()
#14 0x0808da4b in main ()


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-13  9:30 ` bernie at develer dot com
@ 2004-12-13  9:44 ` bernie at develer dot com
  2004-12-13  9:45 ` bernie at develer dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bernie at develer dot com @ 2004-12-13  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2004-12-13 09:44 -------
*** Bug 18542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-13  9:44 ` bernie at develer dot com
@ 2004-12-13  9:45 ` bernie at develer dot com
  2004-12-13 10:19 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bernie at develer dot com @ 2004-12-13  9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2004-12-13 09:45 -------
Please see additional comments attached to PR18542:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18542


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-13  9:45 ` bernie at develer dot com
@ 2004-12-13 10:19 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-13 10:41 ` schwab at suse dot de
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-13 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-13 10:19 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> And you also need -m68020 to trigger the bug.  Works
> fine with -m68000, so the bug must hide in one of the
> TARGET_68020 patterns.

Note: PR 18542 also covers avr-* targets.

I.e. though this PR and PR18542 might be the same for the m68k, I doubt this bug
to be identical to the ICE on the avr.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-13 10:19 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-13 10:41 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2004-12-14 13:58 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-12-13 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2004-12-13 10:38 -------
> I.e. though this PR and PR18542 might be the same for the m68k, I doubt this 
bug 
> to be identical to the ICE on the avr. 
 
You can easily check that by testing if reverting the patch from comment #2  
helps.  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-13 10:41 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-12-14 13:58 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-15 22:37 ` bernie at develer dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-14 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-14 13:58 -------
PR18542 and this PR are not identical:

Proof:
* Compiling the example from comment #3
# m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68020 -O2 -o tmp.o -c pr18549.c
pr18549.c: In function `foo':
pr18549.c:31: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

# m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68000 -O2 -o tmp.o -c pr18549.c
[No ICE]

* Compling the example from PR18542:
# m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68000 -O2 -o tmp.o -c cpuboot.c
cpuboot.c: In function `boot_phase_1':
cpuboot.c:8: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

# m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68020 -O2 -o tmp.o -c cpuboot.c
cpuboot.c: In function `boot_phase_1':
cpuboot.c:8: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

=> The ICE from the example in PR15492 is independent of -m68020

Furthermore, no ICE occurs for the example from comment #3 with avr-*:
# avr-rtems4.7-gcc -O2 -o tmp.o -c pr18549.c

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-14 13:58 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-15 22:37 ` bernie at develer dot com
  2004-12-16  5:33 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bernie at develer dot com @ 2004-12-15 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com  2004-12-15 22:37 -------

> Note: PR 18542 also covers avr-* targets.

Comment #7 in PR18542 said that separate PR's
were going to be filed for avr and h8300.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-15 22:37 ` bernie at develer dot com
@ 2004-12-16  5:33 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-16  5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-16  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-16 05:33 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Comment #7 in PR18542 said that separate PR's
> were going to be filed for avr and h8300.
They were (PR18563 and PR18564), but somebody else has closed them as duplicates
of PR15542 and merged the avr and h8300 variants of PR18542 back into PR18542.

I am going to reopen them and remove the avr/h8300 from PR18542.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-16  5:33 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-16  5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-16  5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-16 05:47 -------
*** Bug 18542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-16  5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-16  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-16 05:49 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Comment #7 in PR18542 said that separate PR's
> > were going to be filed for avr and h8300.
> They were (PR18563 and PR18564), but somebody else has closed them as duplicates
> of PR15542 and merged the avr and h8300 variants of PR18542 back into PR18542.
> 
> I am going to reopen them and remove the avr/h8300 from PR18542.

"You can easily check that by testing if reverting the patch from comment #2  
helps. "

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-16  8:41 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-10  1:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-16  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-16 05:48 -------
*** Bug 18563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-16  8:41 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-10  1:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-16  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-16 08:41 -------
> > I am going to reopen them and remove the avr/h8300 from PR18542.
> 
> "You can easily check that by testing if reverting the patch from comment #2  
> helps. "
Please read what I wrote in comment #10.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
  2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-16  8:41 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-10  1:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-10  1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-10 01:33 -------
Removing target milestone; 68k is not a primary platform.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.4                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-10  1:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-21 11:44 [Bug target/18592] New: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-11-21 11:44 ` [Bug target/18592] " debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-11-21 11:46 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-11-21 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-21 22:59 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-11-23 17:11 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-12-07  0:39 ` belyshev at lubercy dot com
2004-12-13  9:14 ` bernie at develer dot com
2004-12-13  9:30 ` bernie at develer dot com
2004-12-13  9:44 ` bernie at develer dot com
2004-12-13  9:45 ` bernie at develer dot com
2004-12-13 10:19 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-13 10:41 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-12-14 13:58 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-15 22:37 ` bernie at develer dot com
2004-12-16  5:33 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-16  5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-16  5:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-16  8:41 ` corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-10  1:34 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).