From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27047 invoked by alias); 12 May 2005 11:48:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26830 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2005 11:48:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050512114824.26829.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050512094159.21529.etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr> References: <20050512094159.21529.etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/21529] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01659.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-12 11:48 ------- Maybe SRA could be tuned differently for -Os. RTH, do you think it is feasable, or is it only a register allocator problem and should not be handled at the tree level at all? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529