From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30064 invoked by alias); 12 May 2005 19:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30014 invoked by alias); 12 May 2005 19:30:58 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050512193058.30013.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "joern dot rennecke at st dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050225161912.20211.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050225161912.20211.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/20211] autoincrement generation is poor X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01717.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-05-12 19:30 ------- Subject: Re: autoincrement generation is poor pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12 18:59 ------- >The only change is the following: >before: >bzip2-1.0.2,compress,9408 >bzip2-1.0.2,decompress,10604 >after: >bzip2-1.0.2,compress,9428 >bzip2-1.0.2,decompress,10640 > > > Well, there were also lots of small changes. As said before, if you add it all up, the net difference is just four bytes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20211