From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4346 invoked by alias); 13 May 2005 14:57:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4244 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2005 14:57:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050513145750.4243.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050513144556.21548.schwab@suse.de> References: <20050513144556.21548.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/21548] [4.0 regression] Wrong warning about uninitialized variable X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01786.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 14:57 ------- The compiler can't be expected to follow that logic. If blocksize is set to zero by some magic daemon, then the bytes would be undefined. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21548