From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28108 invoked by alias); 13 May 2005 19:27:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28072 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2005 19:27:54 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050513192754.28071.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050513192329.21554.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050513192329.21554.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/21554] [4.0 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test fails on hppa64-hpux X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01815.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 19:27 ------- What was the purpose of applying this patch to 4.0 branch? Did it fix a regression? I can't find this patch (looking for the ChangeLog entry test) in my gcc-patches folders. As the patch changes the testsuite harness it changes what each test tests so the appearance of a FAIL might or might not strictly be a regression (depending on whether the same test and harness combination fail or pass with older compiler versions) but it seems undesirable on a release branch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21554