From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-142709-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28329 invoked by alias); 14 May 2005 14:09:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28279 invoked by uid 48); 14 May 2005 14:09:44 -0000
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:09:00 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20050514140942.21568.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21568] New: [3.4 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01899.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

For the testcase

int x;
int foo(void)
{
        x = 0;
        return *(volatile int *)&x;
}

the tree-optimizers omit the volatile cast and cprop 0 to the
return statement which is invalid.  This is a regression from
3.4 where we produced (with -O)

foo:
        pushl   %ebp
        movl    %esp, %ebp
        movl    $0, x
        movl    x, %eax
        popl    %ebp
        ret

and now

foo:
        pushl   %ebp
        movl    %esp, %ebp
        movl    $0, x
        movl    $0, %eax
        popl    %ebp
        ret

-- 
           Summary: [3.4 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21568