From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1109 invoked by alias); 16 May 2005 20:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1084 invoked by alias); 16 May 2005 20:05:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050516200552.1083.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050323163529.20605.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050323163529.20605.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20605] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c scan-tree-dump-times iter 0 fails X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02238.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-16 20:05 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c scan-tree-dump-times iter 0 fails On Mon, 16 May 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Or it might be the testcase which is matching it wrong, someone already asked about this testcase > before on IRC (IIRC) and the regex was just matching wrongly. No, that's bug 21341 (if indeed the problem was the regex, the submitter of the patch which changed the regex didn't mention the bug and its prior change from PASS to FAIL). There are multiple test assertions within the same test file, and when any one changes from PASS to FAIL that is in principle, and in practice in this case, a separate bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01057.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20605