From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27529 invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 22:00:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27177 invoked by uid 48); 17 May 2005 22:00:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050517220030.27175.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050128064457.19664.andreas.pokorny@gmx.de> References: <20050128064457.19664.andreas.pokorny@gmx.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02395.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-17 22:00 ------- > One of HJ's patches is a middle-end patch, and I'm not sure I know > enough to review it. I'd have to start by researching the ELF spec, for > example, and we've found that various version of binutils have weird > behavior around weak/linkonce. So, I'm scared of that one. I understand, of course. Maybe, with your release manager and global maintainer hat, you can "officially" ask the intervention of a middle-end person? My point was also this one... > The front end patch is OK. Thanks a lot. And, as soon as "pluto" has finished testing the whole package I will personally take care of the v3 bits. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664