From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5494 invoked by alias); 18 May 2005 12:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5303 invoked by uid 48); 18 May 2005 12:02:41 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050518120241.5302.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050517233510.21638.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050517233510.21638.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] cris-elf broken, dce is_gimple_reg_type (type=0x0) building newlib X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02437.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-18 12:02 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > In response to comment #2, this is a combined tree, so the > sources are trivially available for all and you shouldn't need > to be handed preprocessed code separately. I am sorry but this is what our rules say. There is no exception for free code bases where the bugmaster/bugfixer could potentially download and build the package himself. Whoever reported the bug can surely build the preprocessed source much faster than who happens to see the report. I believe this is a sound rule. > Having said that, I'll attach preprocessed versions hoping for a > quick resolution. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21638