From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20490 invoked by alias); 18 May 2005 16:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20386 invoked by uid 48); 18 May 2005 16:01:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050518160144.20385.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050517233510.21638.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050517233510.21638.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] dce is_gimple_reg_type (type=0x0) building newlib X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02470.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 16:01 ------- In reply to comment #3: No, I don't think your reading of what rules you refer to is "sane", but then perhaps you're not used to building a unified tree for cross toolchains, re: simtest-howto.html. If you'd done that with any regularity, then you'd have all the bits and would not see newlib as "free code bases to download yourself". I stand by this; I think it can be expected that people test with cross toolchains, for better test coverage than just their "native" machines. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21638