From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4483 invoked by alias); 18 May 2005 17:15:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4402 invoked by uid 48); 18 May 2005 17:15:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 17:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050518171542.4401.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040721123206.16657.falk@debian.org> References: <20040721123206.16657.falk@debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/16657] Dead stack adjustion code not removed X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02475.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 17:15 ------- We don't assign TImode to this structure, because we assume TImode needs 128-bit alignment, and this structure has 64-bit alignment. Which means that the structure gets BLKmode. All BLKmode parameters are allocated stack space in assign_parm_setup_block. What we'd like to do is allocate a TImode register anyway. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657