From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7971 invoked by alias); 19 May 2005 16:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7029 invoked by uid 48); 19 May 2005 16:44:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050519164401.7028.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050517134432.21621.P.Schaffnit@access.rwth-aachen.de> References: <20050517134432.21621.P.Schaffnit@access.rwth-aachen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/21621] Inconsistency with binary sequential output X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02611.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 16:43 ------- Can you be a little more specific on what you're trying to do and why you think that what gfortran does is wrong? I don't think the standard requires sequential access files to be in any reliable format. I find the results surprising, but I'm not yet sure it's a bug. [tobi@marktplatz tests]$ gfortran pr21621.f [tobi@marktplatz tests]$ ./a.out 666.00 13 0.0000 1143373824 8 13 [tobi@marktplatz tests]$ g77 pr21621.f [tobi@marktplatz tests]$ ./a.out 666.00 13 666.00 13 8 8 [tobi@marktplatz tests]$ -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-19 16:43:58 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21621