public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <20041113162557.18462.peturrun@internet.is>
@ 2005-05-01  2:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-01  2:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-01  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-01 02:10 -------
Both this and PR 21308 are caused by:
2002-09-30  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>

        * class.c (walk_subobject_offsets): Correct the calculation of
        offsets for virtual bases.  Correct the counting of array 
        elements.
....

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <20041113162557.18462.peturrun@internet.is>
  2005-05-01  2:10 ` [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-01  2:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-01  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-01 02:28 -------
Oh, this is reproducable in 3.3.3 with -fabi-version=2.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <20041113162557.18462.peturrun@internet.is>
  2005-05-01  2:10 ` [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-01  2:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-19 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-26 16:45 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-19 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.4                       |3.4.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <20041113162557.18462.peturrun@internet.is>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-19 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-26 16:45 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-19 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-19 18:35 -------
*** Bug 22562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |work at paul dot dubuc dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <20041113162557.18462.peturrun@internet.is>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-19 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-26 16:45 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-07-26 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2005-07-26 16:39 -------
The testcase in PR18602 does not cause a segfault anymore for GCC 3.4 CVS. Is 
this bug fixed then? Or do we need a new testcase?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <bug-18462-4127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-10-07  3:33 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-06 19:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-06 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-06 19:53 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21308 ***


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
       [not found] <bug-18462-4127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-07  3:33 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-06 19:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-07  3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.5                       |3.4.6


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
  2004-11-13 16:26 [Bug c++/18462] New: " peturr02 at ru dot is
  2004-11-13 16:26 ` [Bug c++/18462] " peturr02 at ru dot is
  2004-12-07 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-09 15:10 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-09 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 18462 depends on bug 16681, which changed state.

Bug 16681 Summary: [3.3/3.4 regression] array initialization in struct construct is a memory hog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16681

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
  2004-11-13 16:26 [Bug c++/18462] New: " peturr02 at ru dot is
  2004-11-13 16:26 ` [Bug c++/18462] " peturr02 at ru dot is
@ 2004-12-07 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-09 15:10 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-07 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-07 21:32 -------
Fixed on the mainline by the patch which fixed 18602.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|3.4.3 4.0.0                 |3.4.3
      Known to work|3.3                         |3.3 4.0.0
            Summary|[3.4/4.0 Regression]        |[3.4 Regression] Segfault on
                   |Segfault on declaration of  |declaration of large array
                   |large array member          |member


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member
  2004-11-13 16:26 [Bug c++/18462] New: " peturr02 at ru dot is
@ 2004-11-13 16:26 ` peturr02 at ru dot is
  2004-12-07 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-09 15:10 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: peturr02 at ru dot is @ 2004-11-13 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From peturr02 at ru dot is  2004-11-13 16:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=7539)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7539&action=view)
Preprocessed source code


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-06 19:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20041113162557.18462.peturrun@internet.is>
2005-05-01  2:10 ` [Bug c++/18462] [3.4 Regression] Segfault on declaration of large array member pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-01  2:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-19 17:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-19 18:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 16:45 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
     [not found] <bug-18462-4127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-07  3:33 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-06 19:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-13 16:26 [Bug c++/18462] New: " peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-11-13 16:26 ` [Bug c++/18462] " peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-12-07 21:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 15:10 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).