From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21879 invoked by alias); 19 May 2005 18:49:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12205 invoked by uid 48); 19 May 2005 17:54:52 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050519175452.12203.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050408160549.20900.jv244@cam.ac.uk> References: <20050408160549.20900.jv244@cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20900] use-associated variable may not be equivalenced X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02789.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-05-19 17:54 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > There's no 11.7 neither in the F95 nor the F2K drafts I'm having. This is > invalid by the constraints in 5.5.1 in the F95 draft. Is there any other > constraint you were aiming at? No, off-by-one, refering to 'note 11.8' in 11.3.2 which mentions the same constraint. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20900