From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4034 invoked by alias); 20 May 2005 17:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3928 invoked by alias); 20 May 2005 17:22:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050520172250.3925.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050425143552.21218.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050425143552.21218.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21218] [4.1 regression] ICE using -ftree-vectorize X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg02881.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-05-20 17:22 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE using -ftree-vectorize > > ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-20 16:56 ------- > The problem disappeared with Jan Hubicka's patch > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00805.html > > Is the patch a proper fix (i.e. can we close the PR) > or does it only paper over the problem? I would say that it just masks the problem somehow. The non-dominated use would be probably produced much later in optimization queue than my patch affects. Honza > > > -- > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot > | |org > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21218 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21218