[Bug bootstrap/21698] creating first stage compiler

["jlm_devel at laposte dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

------- Additional Comments From jlm_devel at laposte dot net  2005-05-21 17:50 -------
maybe, I can too using several workaround like crosstool.sh is doing.... but
this lead to have the target tree be located at the same place of the
crosschain.... which is a nonsens...
why a target filesystem's location MUST depend on where the chain is located?

anyway the issue is related to gcc/libgcc.mk

seeking into the logs I found that make gcc-all was doing a 
make \
  CFLAGS="-mtune=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -Wno-deprecated-declarations -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic
-Wno-long-long  " \
  CONFIG_H="config.h  auto-host.h ./../include/ansidecl.h" \
  MAKEOVERRIDES= \
  -f libgcc.mk all

which fail....
on the other hand when doing a make all in gcc/ you still get the right libgcc.a

so i'll make a patch....
anyway since you're using gnu make why are the Makefiles such a mess (lot of
redefines, no use of include....)

so I still maintain that the --with-local-prefix= in configure should be used to
give information where the headers are located (all the docs I read say so....)
and that there is an issue with libgcc.mk

as you say peoples are doing crosscompiler everyday but look at crosstool.sh 's
hacks to be sure there are a issue....

by the way : should the gcc libraries not be independant of a libc? 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21698