From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16095 invoked by alias); 21 May 2005 23:26:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15588 invoked by uid 48); 21 May 2005 23:26:10 -0000 Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 23:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050521232610.15587.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "g_bugz at zewt dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040131115251.13943.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20040131115251.13943.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03024.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From g_bugz at zewt dot org 2005-05-21 23:26 ------- (Awesome. I spend ten minutes typing out a response, the tracker goes "you can't do that!", and I lose it all. Only Debian gets their tracker right ...) (Very old response, since the fact that this was closed was just forwarded to me through Debian earlier today.) I believe the merge with 13924 was in error; it talks about partial definitions, which is unrelated to this problem (which does not go away if is also included). In this test case, abs() and labs() work fine; only llabs() (and, I think, other C99 math functions, eg. lldiv) fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943