* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2004-01-31 18:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-02 23:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-31 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31 18:56 -------
Confirmed, most likely what needs to happen is to add a check to libstdc++'s configure for llabs.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-01-31 18:56:11
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-01-31 18:56 ` [Bug libstdc++/13943] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-02-02 23:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-05-21 23:26 ` g_bugz at zewt dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-02-02 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-02-02 23:16 -------
This is a duplicate of PR 13924.
W.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13924 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-01-31 18:56 ` [Bug libstdc++/13943] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-02 23:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-05-21 23:26 ` g_bugz at zewt dot org
2005-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: g_bugz at zewt dot org @ 2005-05-21 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From g_bugz at zewt dot org 2005-05-21 23:26 -------
(Awesome. I spend ten minutes typing out a response, the tracker goes "you
can't do that!", and I lose it all. Only Debian gets their tracker right ...)
(Very old response, since the fact that this was closed was just forwarded to
me through Debian earlier today.)
I believe the merge with 13924 was in error; it talks about partial
definitions, which is unrelated to this problem (which does not go away if
<cmath> is also included). In this test case, abs() and labs() work fine; only
llabs() (and, I think, other C99 math functions, eg. lldiv) fails.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-21 23:26 ` g_bugz at zewt dot org
@ 2005-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-21 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 23:34 -------
Reopening for now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-22 9:15 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-21 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 23:35 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed, most likely what needs to happen is to add a check to libstdc++'s configure for llabs.
This again should happen.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-22 9:15 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-22 9:32 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-22 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 09:15 -------
Gaby, can you have a look? It seems to me that we should use the same approach
used in std_cmath.h for fpclassify & co. In particular, when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99
is defined - that explicitly checks for llabs and lldiv - do *not* open code
llabs and lldiv. Probably the open coding of the overloads abs(long long) and
div(long long, long long) should stay, however, as a straightforward extension
of 26.5/4 for long long.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pcarlini at suse dot de, gdr
| |at integrable-solutions dot
| |net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-22 9:15 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-22 9:32 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-22 10:32 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-22 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 09:32 -------
Same for strt* and the other functions. Also we should remember to add to the
acinclude check for c99_stdlib the functions strtoll and strtoull, currently
missing.
(PS. In the meanwhile, done a minimal check that the approach used in std_cmath
for the classification macros appear to work well also for llabs)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-22 9:32 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-22 10:32 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-22 21:20 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-05-22 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-05-22 10:32 -------
Subject: Re: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Gaby, can you have a look?
Yup. Just woke up and many people are awaiting in the TODO queue...
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-22 10:32 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2005-05-22 21:20 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-05-26 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 10:56 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-05-22 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 21:20 -------
Actually, I have a much better idea, that I'm testing right now: no need for
complex template-based tricks (in this case, at variance with the case of
classification macros, we *know* the type of the arguments!): llabs and lldiv
are protected by _GLIBCXX_USE_C99, therefore in namespace __gnu_cxx we can
simply do 'using ::llabs' ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-22 21:20 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2005-05-26 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 10:56 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-26 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26 15:47 -------
Subject: Bug 13943
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: paolo@gcc.gnu.org 2005-05-26 15:46:48
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog acinclude.m4 configure
libstdc++-v3/include/c_std: std_cstdlib.h
Added files:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/cstdlib: 13943.cc
Log message:
2005-05-26 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
PR libstdc++/13943
* include/c_std/std_cstdlib.h: Do not open code llabs and lldiv,
available when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 is defined.
* testsuite/26_numerics/cstdlib/13943.cc: New.
* acinclude.m4 ([GLIBCXX_ENABLE_C99]): For completeness, check
also strtoll and strtoull for ac_c99_stdlib.
* configure: Regenerate.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3016&r2=1.3017
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.313&r2=1.314
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/configure.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.438&r2=1.439
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/cstdlib/13943.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/c_std/std_cstdlib.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
2004-01-31 11:52 [Bug libstdc++/13943] New: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-26 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-07 10:56 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-09-07 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-07 10:55 -------
Fixed for 4.1.0.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread