From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32323 invoked by alias); 22 May 2005 21:20:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32082 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2005 21:20:40 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 21:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050522212040.32081.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040131115251.13943.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20040131115251.13943.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03117.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 21:20 ------- Actually, I have a much better idea, that I'm testing right now: no need for complex template-based tricks (in this case, at variance with the case of classification macros, we *know* the type of the arguments!): llabs and lldiv are protected by _GLIBCXX_USE_C99, therefore in namespace __gnu_cxx we can simply do 'using ::llabs' ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943