From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16505 invoked by alias); 23 May 2005 09:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16417 invoked by uid 48); 23 May 2005 09:05:53 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 09:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050523090553.16416.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050517134432.21621.P.Schaffnit@access.rwth-aachen.de> References: <20050517134432.21621.P.Schaffnit@access.rwth-aachen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/21621] Inconsistency with binary sequential output X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03154.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2005-05-23 09:05 ------- Hi! I was trying to read some binary data written by a GFortran binary with binaries written with other compilers (LF, SGI), and I couldn't get anywhere, so I just started to poke around to see where it came from... I tried to have a look at the Fortran standard, but I didn't get anywhere, but my experience with several compilers is that they do use this REC-LENGTH thing, so (and g77 did also!), so I would say it would be a pity to have trouble reading old binary data from g77 with gfortran... It's actually a rather self-centered comment, but maybe I'm not the only one... Cheers! Philippe -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21621