From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14674 invoked by alias); 24 May 2005 23:06:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14604 invoked by alias); 24 May 2005 23:06:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 23:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050524230652.14603.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dnovillo at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050208234456.19833.janis@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050208234456.19833.janis@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19833] bogus uninitialized variable warning for powerpc64 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03327.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-05-24 23:06 ------- Subject: Re: bogus uninitialized variable warning for powerpc64 On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:02:09PM -0000, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Diego, can this PR be closed as fixed? > Yes. Apologies for not having done this before. The uninitialized warning machinery needs to be re-designed, though. Right now, we are at the mercy of whether certain passes were done in some specific order. Diego. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19833