From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22252 invoked by alias); 26 May 2005 12:59:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22205 invoked by uid 48); 26 May 2005 12:59:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050526125926.22204.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ams at gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050522121257.21706.ams@gnu.org> References: <20050522121257.21706.ams@gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03464.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ams at gnu dot org 2005-05-26 12:59 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Like most POSIX limits PATH_MAX may not be defined if the actual limit is not > fixed. Correct, and GNU doesn't have such a limit for the length of filenames, the number of arguments passed to a program or the length of a hostname. And probobly a whole bunch of other things that have slipped my mind right now. All of this is perfectly compliant with POSIX. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706