From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2603 invoked by alias); 26 May 2005 17:43:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2572 invoked by uid 48); 26 May 2005 17:43:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050526174329.2571.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050526165558.21770.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050526165558.21770.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03493.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-26 17:43 ------- This is news to me too: what about 23.1/8? It says: "All other constructors for these container types take an Allocator& argument (20.1.5), an allocator whose value type is the same as the container's value type" Allocator is the template argument of the vector class, of course. Missing a clarification of the above, or a DR?!?, I consider this as an extension, lower priority than other new issues. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770