From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29201 invoked by alias); 26 May 2005 20:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29103 invoked by alias); 26 May 2005 20:12:25 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050526201225.29102.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bkoz at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050526165558.21770.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050526165558.21770.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg03511.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2005-05-26 20:12 ------- Subject: Re: rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type Yo P, just trying to get through the deluge. I've not looked into specifics, so sorry for such a vague marker in bugzilla. I'm not quite sure of where the standard stands on this. I think it's QoI, not required. However, it seems like a good idea. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770