From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18068 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 17:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18036 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 17:32:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050531173234.18035.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050531133755.21839.mclinden@informed.net> References: <20050531133755.21839.mclinden@informed.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21839] [4.1 Regression] ICE for missing V_DEFS caused by salias with empty structures X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg04063.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31 17:32 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE for missing V_DEFS caused by salias with empty structures On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 17:25 +0000, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31 17:25 ------- > Are you sure my changes changed this behaviour? IIRC my changes removed the > funky behaviour of ignoring the first field's offset. (well, that was the intent > anyway) I don't believe I changed the DECL_SIZE check bit. > I looked, and it appears you are right. Sorry bout that. :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21839