From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14604 invoked by alias); 31 May 2005 22:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14192 invoked by uid 48); 31 May 2005 22:06:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 22:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050531220609.14191.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "janis at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050421230833.21155.janis@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050421230833.21155.janis@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21155] [4.1 Regression] ICE in ssa tree check compiling crafty with -ftree-vectorize -maltivec X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg04099.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31 22:06 ------- With sources from an hour ago I get the same ICE compiling 176.gcc and 191.fma3d on powerpc64-linux using "-m64 -O2 -ftree-vectorize -maltivec"; all other SPEC CPU2000 tests compile and run successfully using those options with the same compiler. These sources include both of the patches mentioned in comment #6. Dorit, can you reproduce these using a powerpc64-linux cross compiler? To test an ICE it's only necessary to build cc1; I can send you the script I use. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21155