* [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT
[not found] <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com>
@ 2003-06-05 1:00 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-07-07 11:59 ` francois-xavier dot kowalski at hp dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-05 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet| |ia64-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet| |ia64-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet| |ia64-redhat-linux
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-05 01:00 -------
Loren,
is there a reason this report is still in WAITING? Thanks,
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT
[not found] <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com>
2003-06-05 1:00 ` [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-07-07 11:59 ` francois-xavier dot kowalski at hp dot com
2003-07-07 19:07 ` ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: francois-xavier dot kowalski at hp dot com @ 2003-07-07 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
------- Additional Comments From francois-xavier dot kowalski at hp dot com 2003-07-07 11:59 -------
1. Do I have to populate any kind of information so that this DR can move
forward to a non-WAITING state?
2. BTW, the pre-processor #define that should be added for GCC on HP-UX 11.x are
"-D_REENTRANT -D_PTHREADS_DRAFT4", not only "-D_REENTRANT". The link statement
remain "-lpthread".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT
[not found] <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com>
2003-06-05 1:00 ` [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-07-07 11:59 ` francois-xavier dot kowalski at hp dot com
@ 2003-07-07 19:07 ` ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-20 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-07 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot |
|org |
------- Additional Comments From ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-07 19:07 -------
I have no further opinion on this matter (my position is that this is an
inconsistency
between ports not a bug with any one of them). It appears that the only way to move
out of WAITING is to supply a patch to an HP maintainer or excite one to fix it.
Please note that I'm not such a person.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT
[not found] <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-07 19:07 ` ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-20 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-02 18:23 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2005-07-29 11:09 ` david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-08-20 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Keywords| |documentation
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-08-20 21:20:50
date| |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-20 21:20 -------
I really want to say this is documentation error rather than an errror due to GCC so changing back
to NEW. The documentation should talk about -pthread in a more non-target specfic way and
then add something about it for AIX unless some else (maintainers) agrues otherwise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT
[not found] <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-20 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-02 18:23 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2005-07-29 11:09 ` david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2005-06-02 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-06-02 18:23 -------
I am going to resolve this as invalid since I can't find any documentation to
fix. All the existing documentation I checked, even 3.2.2, is generic about what
flags pthread sets. None of them mention _REENTRENT.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/10865] [ia64] gcc -pthread does not add -D_REENTRANT
[not found] <20030519153600.10865.francois-xavier.kowalski@hp.com>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-02 18:23 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
@ 2005-07-29 11:09 ` david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk @ 2005-07-29 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:02 -------
This bug is not invalid; it is a special case of bug 20705.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread