From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30948 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2005 13:55:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30937 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jun 2005 13:55:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050603135545.30936.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040309003513.14495.kazu@cs.umass.edu> References: <20040309003513.14495.kazu@cs.umass.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/14495] [tree-ssa] Propagate range info into a switch statement X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-03 13:55 ------- The issue is that the propagator engine does not implement the concept of multiway branches taking some edges. It supports ONE, NONE or ALL. Frankly, I'm not at all convinced that this is worth handling. But if we were to handle it, the place to fix is the propagator engine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14495