From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14378 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2005 17:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14343 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2005 17:57:14 -0000 Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 17:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050605175714.14340.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050517114202.21619.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050517114202.21619.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/21619] [4.0 regression] __builtin_constant_p(&"Hello"[0])?1:-1 not compile-time constant X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00828.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-05 17:57 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] __builtin_constant_p(&"Hello"[0])?1:-1 not compile-time constant mark at codesourcery dot com wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-05 17:35 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] __builtin_constant_p(&"Hello"[0])?1:-1 > not compile-time constant > > pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > >>------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-05 17:30 ------- >>Mark this is fixed on the 4.0 branch, the middle-end part was PR 21595 and was commited to 4.0 >>branch: >>2005-05-27 Richard Guenther >> >> PR middle-end/21595 >> * builtins.c (fold_builtin_constant_p): Handle >> &"string cst"[0] as constant. >> >>And the testcase here works now. >> >>Were you using an old branch to test on? That was exactly the problem; I've now checked in the testcase and will close the PR. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21619